View Full Version : H2 - Merge Phase 2 - VPN
alanhcisco
02-15-2019, 02:37 PM
Guys, just confused regarding H2 Merge Phase 2. In one solution its mentioned to use the LOCAL-AS towards Jamesons RR- R1. In others its suggesting to delete the BGP config and recreate with NEW AS-NUMBER 65001. - Similar to H2+. Which is the correct way?
Also is H2 still active :D or only H2+
ASN373
02-17-2019, 06:36 AM
if the output asks you to have (65001 65001) then use the as-override in the PE routers.
if the output asks you to have (65001 65002) then use the allowas-in in the CE routers.
alanhcisco
02-17-2019, 07:12 AM
if the output asks you to have (65001 65001) then use the as-override in the PE routers.
if the output asks you to have (65001 65002) then use the allowas-in in the CE routers.
No, My question is about Jacobs and Jamesons integration NOT the PE-CE in Jamesons DC. Hope its clear
ASN373
02-17-2019, 09:10 AM
If the question says recover with as 65001 then you have to delete the bgp config in R50/51/52 and recreate with AS65001.
alanhcisco
02-18-2019, 12:39 PM
If the question says recover with as 65001 then you have to delete the bgp config in R50/51/52 and recreate with AS65001.
Thanks. Then in what case we can use LOCAL-AS towards the RR - R1
alanhcisco
02-20-2019, 06:23 AM
In H2+ we need to. but in H2, that was the question
shoegum
02-20-2019, 06:28 AM
H2 and H2+ show same wording for the question but different solutions in the workbooks posted.
H2 it shows local as towards R1
H2+ shows changing the BGP AS
what gives?
alanhcisco
02-21-2019, 10:07 AM
H2 and H2+ show same wording for the question but different solutions in the workbooks posted.
H2 it shows local as towards R1
H2+ shows changing the BGP AS
what gives?
Thats my question. Why we are chossing one over another ?
alanhcisco
02-22-2019, 03:23 AM
I cant see any difference in question. Would you mind pasting the question please ?
fampfamp01
03-22-2019, 04:28 PM
Great Thanks alot
Powered by IECollection; Copyright IECollection, Inc. All rights reserved.