Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Passed LAB TS2, CFG H3 updated, DIAG H2+

  1. #1

    Passed LAB TS2, CFG H3 updated, DIAG H2+

    Hello Guys , Firstly I want to thank CC Dreamer and Combat for Their Efforts , and Without CCIE4Career update , It was very hard To pass The Exam .
    Recently Got The Updates From CC Dreamer and Practiced alot .
    About Exam : I dont know other countries , but in Dubai The test center is very Good , Console is not that much slow , speed is good .
    When I was Working On the The PC in Exam I feeled like I'm in home and working in my own PC . Speed is good , Console is Good , alot of Bugs which i
    heard From The Feedback of candidates wasnt there , room temprature was also normal , by the way i was wearing a jacket lolz .

    TS2
    1: there was vlan access-map configured sequence 1 was deny , sequence 2 was permit , in sequence 1 there was an access-list 111
    I added sequence 25 with deny ip any any
    2: The Trace output Required The patch to go via R14 , But it was going through R15 : added Next-hop-self in R14 and There was ospf cost 9
    configured under interface Just Manipulate that and Make that ip ospf cost 10 , after clearing Ip bgp * soft , trace Gone Via R14.
    3: This Trace and load balancing which required was a bit Tricky as Follows :
    they Required that my Trace should Be Like This :
    SW110#traceroute 10.2.200.254
    Type escape sequence to abort.
    Tracing the route to 10.2.200.254
    VRF info: (vrf in name/id, vrf out name/id)
    1 10.1.22.1 1 msec
    10.1.20.1 1 msec
    10.1.22.1 1 msec
    2 10.1.112.1 1 msec
    10.1.212.1 0 msec
    10.1.112.1 1 msec
    3 10.12.22.2 1 msec 1 msec 1 msec
    4 10.2.122.2 [AS 65002] 2 msec 2 msec 2 msec
    5 10.2.20.2 [AS 65002] 2 msec 3 msec
    !
    -SW210#traceroute 10.1.200.254
    Type escape sequence to abort.
    Tracing the route to 10.1.200.254
    VRF info: (vrf in name/id, vrf out name/id)
    1 10.2.22.1 1 msec
    10.2.20.1 1 msec
    10.2.22.1 0 msec
    2 10.2.122.1 0 msec
    10.2.222.1 0 msec
    10.2.122.1 0 msec
    3 10.12.22.1 [AS 65001] 1 msec 0 msec 1 msec
    4 10.1.212.2 [AS 65001] 2 msec 2 msec 1 msec
    5 10.1.22.2 [AS 65001] 2 msec 4 msec

    So When I t-shoot The loopback of R23 was in Wrong ospf process ID , So Fixed That and in The access-list which Advertised The Even prefixes for R12
    needed to add Set origin IGP in order to fix , Caue R13 had Set metric 2 but origin IGP .
    And For This Traceroute IN Order The path to be like this We need To advertise the link between Ebgp Peers Or R12-22 , R13-23 .
    So I advertised From The link From R22 and R23 , The Traceroute Output Become like This :

    SW110#traceroute 10.2.200.254
    Type escape sequence to abort.
    Tracing the route to 10.2.200.254
    VRF info: (vrf in name/id, vrf out name/id)
    1 10.1.22.1 1 msec
    10.1.20.1 1 msec
    10.1.22.1 1 msec
    2 10.1.112.1 1 msec
    10.1.212.1 0 msec
    10.1.112.1 1 msec
    3 10.12.22.2 [AS 65002] 1 msec 1 msec 1 msec
    4 10.2.122.2 [AS 65002] 2 msec 2 msec 2 msec
    5 10.2.20.2 [AS 65002] 2 msec 3 msec
    !
    -SW210#traceroute 10.1.200.254
    Type escape sequence to abort.
    Tracing the route to 10.1.200.254
    VRF info: (vrf in name/id, vrf out name/id)
    1 10.2.22.1 1 msec
    10.2.20.1 1 msec
    10.2.22.1 0 msec
    2 10.2.122.1 0 msec
    10.2.222.1 0 msec
    10.2.122.1 0 msec
    3 10.12.22.1 1 msec 0 msec 1 msec
    4 10.1.212.2 [AS 65001] 2 msec 2 msec 1 msec
    5 10.1.22.2 [AS 65001] 2 msec 4 msec

    4: They Want The Traceroute from Server2 via R21 , But The Question Stated Dont change any Bgp Attribute , So i Manipulate The Cost of Loopback 0 of R20 to 1000.
    The problem Solved.
    5MVPN : Only correct The Mask OF R60 to /24.
    6: VLan 2001 of SW111 is not advertised in OSPFv3 , Just Advertised It .
    7: In MPLS Vpn R5 loopback 0 was configured in Wrong ospf proccess ID Just put it in correct proccess id , and R10 Got #Ospf distance 19 , I change The Distance to 210 . clear ip ospf process.
    8: Arp Inspection was configured in SW310 port-channel 2 , just Configured it in port-channel 1 also Problem Solved .
    9: There was Ip ospf network mismatch , changed the network type of R71 to point-to-multipoint.
    10: Just Added Ip nat inside source static tcp ...... and ip nat outised source static .......

    DIAG
    H2 +
    Was same as Workbook.

    H3 CFG
    At the first Which The CFG started , The first thing i did was going on SW300/301/310 and Do the command # show run | s spanning-tree
    They were configured with "no spanning-tree mst simulate pvst global" , just Removed NO in order to MST work.
    Section 1 : exactly Same
    Section 1.2 : exactly Same

    Section 1.3
    Same
    only :
    There is vlan 3001 on SW310
    so there will be Block interfaces for MST3, but in question, only required access vlan (2000-2009), so it's no problem
    !
    After Section 1 , I go For Section 4 :
    4.1 : exactly Same only needed to add # ipv6 nd raguard policy RAFILTERING
    #hop-limit maximum 2
    4.2 : Same
    !
    5.1 : Exactly Same , configured according to New H3 update .
    5.2 : exactly Same .
    5.3 : exactly Same .
    5.4 : Exactly Same , the preconfiguration only Configured standby Ip . no preemtion , delay , timers , so added them .
    !
    Then I come To Section 2 :
    2.1 Exactly Same , all Routers In headquarters Configured With correct router-id under ospf .
    2.2 Ospf was preconfigured with correct router-id , But Sw111 had loopback 2001 , advertised that loopback into ospf ,
    loopback 1 of SW100 and Sw101 was not advertised in ospf "neccessary for Multicast " Advertised Them , No passive interface was configured under
    SW110 and Sw111 so only prefix-suppression under ospf process Needed.
    2.3 Ospf was preconfigured with Correct Router-ids , only issue was Vlan 2000 and 2001 was passived under ospf process but not advertised in OSPF
    Advertised vlan 2000, 2001 in OSPF , cause its neccessary for Later when the output requies ping from User4.
    Could not touch R100 , Configured R42 with Proccess ID 2 and implement The Filtering according to new H3 Update.
    2.4 Exactly Same , correct router-id was preconfigured under BGP.
    2.5 Implement Multipath , used the commands according to New H3 Update .
    2.6 External Bgp Neighbors were Configured , only thing was To add aggregate-timer , router-id , network , aggregate Statement under BGP . Question Was Exactly Same as workbook
    no required R14 and R15 .
    2.7 Required The Filtering for R10 , R11 , R14 , R15 , R20 , R21 ,
    configred The Filtering according to new H3 update Which sequence 1 with deny statement added at the begining and Configured the filtering for R10.R11 , R14 for DMVPN , R20 and R21
    although R15 was Configured Ebgp with ISP but Only Configured The Prefix-list In R15 didnt configured any filtering For R15.
    2.9 Configured BGP with Connected Ipv6 interfaces , and other same as Workbook , the preconfiguration only Configured Ebgp with ISP without Filtering , So all other things needed to be added .
    Also Needed to add Ipv6 unicast-routing for SW111 .
    2.10 Exactly Same , Requested That in the output Info Source was loopback 1 of SW 100/ SW 101 .
    so configured 2nd Variation of Multicast in The Workbook ,
    Then Started 2.11 : Configured it according To NEw H3 Update , but at the End The question States It should Have The Exact Match :
    """""Everything Matched without R13 , in R13 Requested #sh ip pim rp mapping , The Info source was 10.1.113.2 , It confused me abit , i just thought with my self
    The statement was saying Exact match so i removed the send-rp-discovery loopback 1 from SW100 and SW101 , ANd Remove the rp-announce-filter from Both Switches and Configured
    the Send-RP-discovery to 10.1.113.2 of SW100 , and ADvertised That network into BGP .
    And The OUtput matched as Required , Then I check The Question 2.10 Which The info source was Required was 10.250.250.250 but It was Required IN SW100 , So After My configuration I
    used The command on SW100 # sh ip pim rp mapping : the source was 10.250.250.250 , so Both Problems Was Solved and The Both required Output was Solved , IN R13 the info source was 10.1.113.2.
    Both Output Exactly Matched as The Exam Required.
    ^^^^ The important Point comes into Filtering , I did configure access-list 2 according to New Update and Configured it in the E0/0 of R30/R31 as follows :
    ip multicast boundary 2 filter-autorp
    !
    But When R31 used Ping It Got Replies from Both SW111 and SW300 , It Confused me , after A while I changed the filtering according to this :
    R30/R31 : # int e0/0
    # no ip multicast boundary 2 filter-autorp
    # ip multicast boundary filter-autorp 2
    !
    Then all the Desired Output Matched Exactly AS the Output .
    3.1 Mpls Vpn
    Exacly Same , Only Needed to add mpls ldp router-id loopback 0 force ,
    and Other Config Same AS Work Book .
    Only Point need to be added is The PE routers didnt have RD configured , But IN The output Which needs to match It has Route-distinguisher
    So Copied The RD from The Output to the PE routers in the MPLS VPN , and added The Route-target Export and Import Accoring to That RD.
    3.2 DMVPN
    Exactly Same , Only Alot Of lines on R14 need to be matched By The 2 Spokes ,
    The only Thing I did i go to R14 # added ip nhrp redirect and IP nhrp map multicast dynamic
    and opened a notepad COnfigured Config for R51, R60 Exactly from R14 . Copied it into R51, R60 .
    The DMVPN tunnel Become Up .
    And For IPSEC the crypto Keyring was not configured , Configured them and added them .
    !
    For BGP The spokes were configured for Ebgp without local-as and allowas-in , So FIxed that .
    3.3
    Exactly Same
    3.4
    Exactly Same
    Only Configured Static Route to 201.99.24.1 .
    But when i tried I was not working , I checked and checked again , my config was Correct ,
    after a while i notice when i added the crypto map comman on R71 e0/0 , it was not added WTF , I added the crypto map again . The the Ping And Traceroute worked .

    !!!!!! Finished in 3 hours Verified it and did the command Write in each router in 1 hour.

  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to nokuta For This Useful Post:

    ccieieie (03-21-2019) , mahlekefane (09-22-2018) , shikima (10-17-2018) , yjp58 (10-29-2018)

  3. #2

    Re: Passed LAB TS2, CFG H3 updated, DIAG H2+

    Thanks for your feedback really appreciate, if you dont mind can you share latest workbook? would help a lot since i will go for exam next month

  4. #3

    Re: Passed LAB TS2, CFG H3 updated, DIAG H2+

    congratulation bro

  5. #4

    Re: Passed LAB TS2, CFG H3 updated, DIAG H2+

    Thanks, bro, your feedback is really helpful

  6. #5

    Re: Passed LAB TS2, CFG H3 updated, DIAG H2+

    congratulation bro

    Can you please share new H3 updated, file you talking about

  7. #6

    Re: Passed LAB TS2, CFG H3 updated, DIAG H2+

    Congrats nokuta, can you please share workbook?

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to beece2003 For This Useful Post:

    yjp58 (10-29-2018)

  9. #7

    Re: Passed LAB TS2, CFG H3 updated, DIAG H2+

    congratulation bro

  10. #8

    Re: Passed LAB TS2, CFG H3 updated, DIAG H2+

    congrats brother
    could u plz share the workbook if u have not any problem. that will help the other ccie lab takers.
    thankz in advance

  11. #9

    Re: Passed LAB TS2, CFG H3 updated, DIAG H2+

    thanks for info

  12. #10

    Re: Passed LAB TS2, CFG H3 updated, DIAG H2+

    Can you please share your diag workbook ?
    thanks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •