My friend Passed H3 yesterday

[nowever]

this is the feedback from my friend, He passed exam yesterday with CFG H3. I hope it help

**Hidden Content: Thanks to see the content**

[junitor]

Thank for sharing. can you please share the information about him, I want to contact him and ask him the information about Combat and CC Dreamer

[ccierscisco]

this is the feedback from my friend, He passed exam yesterday with CFG H3. I hope it help

***Hidden content cannot be quoted.***

thanks

[ccierscisco]

Section 2.7
Prefix filter requested on 14 and 15 as well, but at the end of the lab NAT’ing wouldn’t work.
I removed the prefix FILTER from 14 and 15 and all worked … I just took that loss instead of no pings to internet!!!
It means this section you failed and tunnel is not up if nat is not correct....Plz correct me ..I faced also this in my lab but failed in H3 config.

Section 3.4
Same as WB (LOGIC).
R24 was fully preconfigured, only thing I had to add was the static route (which is allowed) and also helps 10.7.0.0/16 go out (redistribute static preconfigured).
R71 had most of the ACL’s preconfigured and the NAT Pool, so used their templates.
However, all of them were missing/wrong ACL definitions.
I redid all the ACL/POOL, but used the name that they had pre-config.

This is also not clear from feedback what exactly you had done in R71 router

[Nexus]

Section 2.7
Prefix filter requested on 14 and 15 as well, but at the end of the lab NAT’ing wouldn’t work.
I removed the prefix FILTER from 14 and 15 and all worked … I just took that loss instead of no pings to internet!!!
It means this section you failed and tunnel is not up if nat is not correct....Plz correct me ..I faced also this in my lab but failed in H3 config.

Section 3.4
Same as WB (LOGIC).
R24 was fully preconfigured, only thing I had to add was the static route (which is allowed) and also helps 10.7.0.0/16 go out (redistribute static preconfigured).
R71 had most of the ACL’s preconfigured and the NAT Pool, so used their templates.
However, all of them were missing/wrong ACL definitions.
I redid all the ACL/POOL, but used the name that they had pre-config.

This is also not clear from feedback what exactly you had done in R71 router

Section 2.7: That is a big prolem, many guys reported he cannot handle this issue.
Section 2.8: I know two variation with this quetsion, depends on the the output you get, the ACL will be modified.

[ccierscisco]

Section 2.8: I know two variation with this quetsion, depends on the the output you get, the ACL will be modified.

Nexus:Can you elaborate the two variation of sec 2.8 ?

[Nexus]

Section 2.8: I know two variation with this quetsion, depends on the the output you get, the ACL will be modified.

Nexus:Can you elaborate the two variation of sec 2.8 ?

This the ouput Cisco will give you. Let me do the lab and share it with you.

[CiscoCCDE]

This the ouput Cisco will give you. Let me do the lab and share it with you.

Please do it and share with us

[abanalaccie]

Do you really think that is really mandatory to filter in R14/R15 if nat pool is configured ? i don't think so because there is no really solution for this. You can also change the nat pool to do by interface and do the filtering it should be work

[ccierscisco]

yes it is asking in exam