-
Failed SP LAB 17 May 2018
Hi all,
i failed sp lab. now i have time to create feedback.
i got: TS3 new (FAILED), Diag (PASSED), CFG2 (PASSED)
This is my feedback:
TS:
i just only remmeber that:
- Topology, question are the same TS3 but faults is diffrent. i wasted time to check Q1, Q2.
i got 58%.
Diag: is the same
CFG2:
i used c4c solution, it look goods.
Q1.1: about isis level 2 in Yellow AS.
Q1.2: BGP confederation in Green AS.
delete AS1, reconfigure AS65035 and AS65046 as request
use ebgp multihop 2 btw eBGP confederation neighbor.
Q1.3: Segment Routing
Segment is perfer LDP
Q1.4: MPLS TE auto configure
create ccess-list should permit all loopback interface in Green AS
Q1.5: MVPN
configure mvpn in yellow AS
Q1.6: QoS
Configure pipe mode. with two QoS policy.
Input QoS apply all interface which facing core network.
Output QoS set bandwidth in interface facing Triang-ce16, ce17
Q2.1 VPLS
in G-PE3, GPE5, G-GPE8: used bgp signaling
Q2.2 InerAS-L3VPN
use OptionC btw G-RR9 and Y-PE4
configure shamelink to match tracer output.
Q2.3. MPLS fast reroute
configure MPLS TE fast reroute in Green AS
Q2.4: 6PE
OVAL-CE15 dont have ipv6 address, configure ipv6 auto configure to get ipv6 address from G-PE8
Q3.1: Ping mulicast from Y-PE4 to square-ce14
Q3.2 B-CE-LITE router didn't vrf SQUARE . Should configure vrf more in B-CE-LITE router.
Q3.3 Leaking route.
Use import/export command to leaking route in G-PE3, GPE4
Q3.4: Port-channel in Y-P1, Y-P2
Minimumlink 2, configure ip and all protocol after cofigure port-channel
Q4.1 BFD
Note BFD for bgp Y-PE4 and G-ASBR6
Q4.2 MPLS LDP protection
note: use access-list permit loopback0 in Yellow AS
Q4.3: QoS
configure H-QoS in G-PE8
Q5.1 BGP flow spec
configure in global with traffic rate limit 500kbps and drop in vrf in B-PE4
Q5.2 RPKI
same c4c solution
Q5.3
same c4c solution
Thanks
Last edited by Nathan1987; 05-21-2018 at 04:12 PM.
-
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Nathan1987 For This Useful Post:
syutou (08-14-2018)
,
zr595576323 (06-17-2018)
-
Re: Failed SP LAB 17 May 2018
Thanks for sharing your experience. Question 1.6, Input policy on interfaces facing core, do you remember this part correctly? As this doesn't make sense why would you need input interfaces from core?
Would you be able to share c4c solution or atleast question for config section?
Thanks
-
-
Re: Failed SP LAB 17 May 2018
Hi Nathan,
thanks for sharing your experience. may I ask you which MVPN profile?
thanks
-
-
Re: Failed SP LAB 17 May 2018
Please share material, arabicuser@hotmail.com
-
-
Re: Failed SP LAB 17 May 2018
-
-
Re: Failed SP LAB 17 May 2018
Hi Nathan,
thanks for sharing your experience and this more important info about the exam..!
-
-
Re: Failed SP LAB 17 May 2018
Please share material, 595576323@qq.com
-
-
Re: Failed SP LAB 17 May 2018
are you sure about the segment routing part?
-
-
Re: Failed SP LAB 17 May 2018
Hi Nathan,
thanks for sharing your experience. may I ask you how much is the cost of c4c solution?
-
-
Re: Failed SP LAB 17 May 2018
Hi Nathan,
can i share with you half amount?
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules