Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 65

Thread: Hot CFG2+ discussion CCIE SPv4.1

  1. #11

    Re: New CFG2 discussion in CCIE SP 2018

    Thanks friend

  2. #12

    Re: New CFG2 discussion in CCIE SP 2018

    Quote Originally Posted by CCIESP View Post
    Hi all,
    i created new thread for discussion about the question, topology, technology about the new cfg lab.
    from the feedback of some guys who got new cfg, i summay the question and topology bellow:

    ***Hidden content cannot be quoted.***

    TOPOLOGY:


    ***Hidden content cannot be quoted.***

  3. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Redes2019 For This Useful Post:

    abhijittamuli@gmail.com (08-17-2019) , addyroadies (06-10-2018) , avi_ec (04-19-2019) , brby (02-13-2019) , charlesredan (09-24-2019) , fabrifibra (06-11-2018) , jaw79 (02-21-2019) , Labing (10-18-2020) , MMZ (10-26-2018) , ner0x (02-12-2021) , Ng23 (05-14-2019) , shahrock (06-02-2019)

  4. #13

    Re: New CFG2 discussion in CCIE SP 2018

    Hi ...password for this file???

  5. #14

    Re: New CFG2 discussion in CCIE SP 2018

    We'll never get the password because the passworded files are spread around by guys who want $$$ for their dumps.

  6. #15

    Re: New CFG2 discussion in CCIE SP 2018

    are you sure about the segment routing part?

  7. #16

    Re: New CFG2 discussion in CCIE SP 2018

    Quote Originally Posted by addyroadies View Post
    Hi ...password for this file???
    www.passsplabs.com

  8. #17

    Re: Hot CFG2+ discussion CCIE SPv4.1

    Hi all, i updated full questions on CFG2

  9. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CCIESP For This Useful Post:

    brby (02-16-2019) , MMZ (10-26-2018)

  10. #18

    Re: Hot CFG2+ discussion CCIE SPv4.1

    Quote Originally Posted by CCIESP View Post
    Hi all, i updated full questions on CFG2
    Thank so much. Thats great

  11. #19

    Re: Hot CFG2+ discussion CCIE SPv4.1

    Anyone have solution. Please share it

  12. #20

    Re: Hot CFG2+ discussion CCIE SPv4.1

    I'm still working on it. Question look fine.
    Do you know Q1.2 solution. Please share it.
    I hear that PSL reconfigure BGP peer from directly to loopback. But C4C used mpls active + static route.
    Who is correct?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •